This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We report a high-precision mass measurement of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mmultiscripts> <a:mi>Zn</a:mi> <a:mprescripts/> <a:none/> <a:mn>61</a:mn> </a:mmultiscripts> </a:math> , performed with the ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer at ISOLDE, CERN. Our result agrees with a recent measurement from the LEBIT Penning trap at FRIB and reduces the mass uncertainty by a factor of four. Combined with recent measurements of the mirror nuclide <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mmultiscripts> <b:mi>Ga</b:mi> <b:mprescripts/> <b:none/> <b:mn>61</b:mn> </b:mmultiscripts> </b:math> performed by TITAN at TRIUMF and CSRe at HIRFL, we obtain a more accurate <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mi>Q</c:mi> </c:math> value. This new value slightly improves the determination of the corresponding <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="script">F</d:mi> <d:mi>t</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:math> value in the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mrow> <f:msub> <f:mi>T</f:mi> <f:mi>z</f:mi> </f:msub> <f:mo>=</f:mo> <f:mn>1</f:mn> <f:mo>/</f:mo> <f:mn>2</f:mn> </f:mrow> </f:math> mirror beta decays used to test the conserved vector current hypothesis in the standard model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giesel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: