Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A combination of in situ and post-deposition experiments were designed to probe surface roughening pathways leading to epitaxial breakdown during low-temperature (Tₛ=95--190^∘C) growth of Ge(001) by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). We demonstrate that epitaxial breakdown in these experiments is not controlled by background hydrogen adsorption or gradual defect accumulation as previously suggested, but is a growth-mode transition driven by kinetic surface roughening. Ge(001) layers grown at Tₛ170^∘C remain fully epitaxial to thicknesses $h>1.6$ {μ}m, while deposition at Tₛ<170^∘C leads to a locally abrupt transition from epitaxial to amorphous growth at critical film thicknesses h₂(Tₛ). Surface morphology during low-temperature Ge(001) MBE evolves via the formation of a periodic array of self-organized round growth mounds which, for deposition at Tₛ>115^∘C, transform to a pyramidal shape with square bases having edges aligned along 〈100〉 directions. Surface widths w and in-plane coherence lengths d increase monotonically with film thickness h at a temperature-dependent rate. As →hh₁(Tₛ), defined as the onset of epitaxial breakdown, deep cusps bounded by {111} facets form at the base of interisland trenches and we show that epitaxial breakdown is initiated on these facets as the surface roughness reaches a critical Tₛ-independent aspect ratio w/d0.02. h₁(Tₛ) and h₂(Tₛ) follow relationships h₁₍₂₎∝exp(-E₁₍₂₎/kTₛ), where E₁ is 0.61 eV and E₂=0.48 eV. E₁ is approximately equal to the Ge adatom diffusion barrier on Ge(001) while (E₁-E₂)=0.13 eV is the free energy difference between crystalline and amorphous Ge. We summarize our results in a microstructural phase map vs Tₛ and h, and propose an atomistic growth model to explain the epitaxial to amorphous phase transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bratland et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: