This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been recommended as the first-line ventilation modality for acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) based on strong evidence. However, everyday clinical practice may differ from findings of multiple randomized controlled trials. Physicians and respiratory therapists involved in NIV management have been queried about its utilization and effectiveness. In addition to these estimates, cohort studies and analysis of large inpatient dataset of patients with AECOPD and ARF managed with NIV have been extensively published over the last two decades. This review summarizes the perception of medical staff vs. the "real life" data about NIV use for ARF in AECOPD patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uğurlu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: