Why the study?
Does the use of a pulmonary artery catheter improve outcomes in anesthesia and critical care patients?
Does the use of a pulmonary artery catheter improve outcomes in anesthesia and critical care patients?
The routine use of pulmonary artery catheters in anesthesia and critical care is not supported by recent evidence, as the measured filling pressures do not accurately reflect left ventricular volume or function and may lead to incorrect management.
Does not support routine pulmonary artery catheter use in anesthesia and critical care; leaves open targeted applications pending randomized trials.
The pulmonary artery catheter has been widely used in anesthesiology and critical care medicine. Until recently, only retrospective or relatively weak prospective studies examining its effect on outcome had been performed. Over the past 6 years, however, a number of well-designed prospective trials and statistically sound retrospective studies have been completed. All of these show no benefit and some even reveal a potential for increased morbidity. Reasons for this device's inability to improve outcome are numerous, including wrong patient selection and misinterpretation, but the most impressive and convincing evidence is that filling pressures measured from the catheter, particularly the pulmonary artery "wedge" pressure, have no physiologic value. The wedge pressure has been shown to not correlate with other accepted methods of determining left ventricular filling or volume or intravascular volume and also does not help to generate cardiac function curves. Therefore, knowledge of it may actually lead to incorrect management more frequently than not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leibowitz et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: