Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) frequently complicates cardiac catheterization, so the objectives of present study were to investigate the usefulness of cystatin C before catheterization and establish a cut-off level for CIN, and to examine the changes in cystatin C and several other markers in patients with and without CIN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study of consecutive 87 patients who underwent elective catheterization: moderate renal disease defined as glomerular filtration rate 30-59 ml . min(-1) .1.73 mm(-2); cystatin C and creatinine (Cr), urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), alpha1, beta2 microglobulins, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and microalbumin were measured immediately before, and 1, 2, and 3 days after catheterization. CIN occurred in 18 patients and receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed a higher area-under-the-curve for cystatin C compared with serum Cr (0.933 vs 0.832 p=0.012). At a cut-off level of >1.2 mg/L, cystatin C before catheterization exhibited 94.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.851-1.015) sensitivity and 84.8% specificity for detecting CIN. Cystatin C levels were higher in CIN patients than in those without CIN, even before catheterization (cystatin C: 1.08+/-0.22 vs 1.36+/-0.28 mg/L, p=0.007). Urinary L-FABP was increased on days 1 and 2 in patients with moderate renal disease. CONCLUSION: Cystatin C was useful for predicting the occurrence of CIN. Urinary L-FABP was the only marker of transient renotubular damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: