Why the study?
To provide an updated safety assessment of recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant therapy.
Does prior direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing recanalization therapy?
Does prior direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing recanalization therapy?
Prior DOAC therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing recanalization therapy does not increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and may be associated with a lower incidence following EVT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports EVT in DOAC-treated AIS patients; extends observational meta-analytic evidence on recanalization safety.
This review provides an updated assessment of the safety of recanalization therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) therapy. We checked the literature for published observational from 1 st January 1950 to 31 st March 2021. The rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), arterial recanalization rate, good functional recovery, and mortality at 3 months were investigated, and data were expressed as Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression analyses were conducted utilizing STATA software. 17 articles [14 for endovascular therapy (EVT) and 3 intravenous thrombolysis for (IVT)] were finally included in the review. AIS patients with DOAC therapy showed a decreased rate of sICH (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.00, P = 0.04), and lower probability of good functional recovery at three months (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.85, P < 0.001) than patients without anticoagulation therapy post EVT. However, no significant differences in sICH rates in AIS patients with DOAC therapy after IVT (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.48 to 1.58, P = 0.64) were observed. AIS patients not prescribed DOAC after EVT had a higher mortality risk (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.15–1.44, P < 0.001). Patients with AIS on DOAC therapy were found to have a lower incidence of sICH following EVT. However, no evidence of an increased bleeding risk in patients previously treated with DOAC after IVT was observed. Therefore, more detailed studies with biological data to monitor compliance and details on the size and etiology/severity of the incident ischemic lesion is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: