Key result
Female sex is not associated with worse survival in AMI-associated cardiogenic shock.
Why the study?
Does female sex or V-A ECMO use affect survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock?
Cohort (n=10,023)
Yes
Does female sex or V-A ECMO use affect survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with AMICS, female sex is not independently associated with worse survival despite older age and lower revascularization rates, while V-A ECMO use is associated with lower long-term survival.
Acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS) remains a condition with high mortality. Some patients require mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as their condition deteriorates. Sex-specific differences in risk factors and outcomes of cardiovascular disease have previously been described but are inconclusive regarding the use of MCS in AMICS. We aimed to investigate these with a focus on long-term outcomes. Health claim data from AOK - Die Gesundheitskasse (local health care funds) for patients hospitalized with AMICS between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, was descriptively analyzed. Then, a Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for confounders. We analyzed 10,023 patients, of which 477 (4.8%) were treated with veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO). In-hospital mortality was high, but similar between treatments (V-A ECMO 59.1%, no V-A ECMO 56.6%). Women had a higher median age (78.9 years, IQR 13.8 vs. 71.8 years, IQR 17.9; p < 0.001), a different cardiovascular risk profile and in the conservatively treated patients underwent revascularization less often (69.2% vs. 77.1%; p < 0.001) than men did. In a multivariate analysis, female sex was not associated with lower survival (HR 1.03, CI 0.98-1.09; p = 0.233). V-A ECMO, however, was associated with lower survival in both sexes. We observed a low overall survival in follow-up after three years (no V-A ECMO: men 28.9% vs. women 21.7%, V-A ECMO: men 18.2% vs. women 17.0%). In conclusion, women with AMICS presented with a different risk profile, especially a higher age, and underwent guideline-recommended therapies such as revascularization less often than men. Female sex, however, was not associated with lower survival in a multivariate analysis. In-hospital mortality was high, regardless of treatment, and V-A ECMO was associated with lower survival in follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckmeyer et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS) (n=10,023). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Survival (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.09, p=0.233). In patients with acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock, female sex was not associated with lower survival compared to men (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.98-1.09; p=0.233).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: