Why the study?
Does male sex compared to female sex affect clinical outcomes in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting?
Does male sex compared to female sex affect clinical outcomes in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting?
Chinese men undergoing PCI with stenting have a higher one-year rate of MACE, driven by target vessel revascularization, compared to women.
Male sex may warrant heightened post-PCI surveillance in Chinese patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding care.
The outcome differences between Chinese male and female patients within one-year follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent remain unclear. The present study was aimed to compare clinical outcomes in such two populations. From May 1999 to December 2009, 4,334 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, stable angina, or silent ischemia, who underwent PCI, were registered at our centers. Among these, 3,089 were men and 1,245 were women. We compared these groups with respect to the primary outcomes of MI and secondary outcomes including a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, MI, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST), definite ST and probable ST at one-year follow-up. Chinese male patients had a higher MACE rate (13% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.039), mainly led by TVR (9.09% vs. 6.98%, P = 0.024) at one year, which was significantly different than female patients. Chinese male and female patients showed a significant difference on MACEs. However, there was no significant difference with respect to MI between these groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: