Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antibiotic MDL 62,879 inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by acting on elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). In this study we show that the inhibition of protein synthesis by MDL 62,879 in an Escherichia coli cell-free system was fully reversed by addition of stoichiometric amounts of EF-Tu but not by large excesses of EF-Ts, ribosomes, or aa-tRNA. MDL 62,879 bound tightly to EF-Tu and formed a stable 1:1 MDL 62,879:EF-Tu (M:EF-Tu) complex. We show that binding of MDL 62,879 to EF-Tu strongly affects the interaction of EF-Tu with aa-tRNA and causes rapid dissociation of preformed EF-Tu.aa-tRNA complex, suggesting that inhibition of aa-tRNA binding is due to a conformational change in EF-Tu rather than competition for the aa-tRNA binding site. Indication of a conformational change in EF-Tu induced by MDL 62,879 is further confirmed by proteolytic cleavage experiments: MDL 62,879 binding strongly protects EF-Tu against trypsin cleavage. The observed effects of MDL 62,879 appear to be different from those of the kirromycin class of antibiotics, which also inhibit protein synthesis by binding to EF-Tu, suggesting two distinct binding sites. Indeed, the M:EF-Tu complex was able to bind stoichiometric amounts of kirromycin to form a 1:1:1 M:EF-Tu:kirromycin (M:EF-Tu:K) complex, providing direct evidence that the two antibiotics bind to independent and distinct sites on the EF-Tu molecule. The interaction of the M:EF-Tu:K complex with aa-tRNA and other co-factors suggest that the contemporary binding of the two antibiotics locks EF-Tu into an intermediate conformation in which neither antibiotic exhibits complete dominance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landini et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: