Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical infrastructure systems in many countries face persistent financing and delivery challenges, including delayed disbursement, limited transparency, and constrained local participation. While blockchain-based systems have been proposed as alternatives, existing work primarily evaluates their technical properties rather than their ability to support resilience under disruption. This paper introduces Community-Based Resilience (CBR) as a framework for evaluating blockchain-enabled infrastructure financing. We propose a modular architecture based on decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs) that enables project-level fundraising, tokenised ownership, and programmable governance through smart contracts on Ethereum-compatible networks. The system is implemented in Solidity and evaluated through static security analysis, gas-cost benchmarking across Ethereum and Layer-2 rollups, and an illustrative discrete-event simulation of fund reallocation under shock. The simulation is not calibrated to a deployed field system; rather, it is used to explore how governance latency and modular reallocation assumptions affect service-continuity metrics under a stylised scenario. Under those assumptions, DAO-based governance produces lower cumulative service loss than a donor-funded baseline, illustrating the design intent rather than validating field performance. The paper contributes a CBR-based evaluation framework, a modular DAO architecture, and a resilience-oriented methodology for assessing infrastructure systems under disruption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levinson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: