Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is a new ultrasound-based elastography method to evaluate liver fibrosis in the daily practice. However, the utility of 2D-SWE among the other liver fibrosis markers is unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 141 consecutive patients with hepatitis C virus infection, 66 men and 75 women (median age, 67 years), who underwent liver biopsy and 2D-SWE (LOGIQ E9, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, USA). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the 2D-SWE with those of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE; MR-Touch, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and platelet counts (PLT), using the histologic METAVIR scoring as the reference standard. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) of 2D-SWE, MRE, M2BPGi, FIB-4 and PLT for ≥F2, ≥F3 and F4 were 0.86, 0.88, 0.79, 0.81 and 0.77; 0.92, 0.93, 0.86, 0.87 and 0.83; and 0.91, 0.97, 0.85, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. For diagnosing ≥F2 and ≥F3, the AUROCs of 2D-SWE and those of MRE showed no significant differences, and both 2D-SWE and MRE showed significantly higher AUROCs than the other markers. For diagnosing F4, the AUROC of MRE was significantly higher than those of other fibrosis markers. CONCLUSION: 2D-SWE has an excellent diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of MRE for assessing significant (≥F2) and severe (≥F3) fibrosis. MRE demonstrated a higher AUROC than 2D-SWE, but this last one has advantages such as lower cost, fewer contraindications and greater ease of performance than MRE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Numao et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: