Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garner et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: