Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chemical modification of antisense oligonucleotides to increase nuclease resistance may improve their efficacy within enzyme-rich cellular targets (e.g. macrophages). We evaluated a panel of morpholino antisense oligomers (M-AS) for their ability to inhibit macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) release and compared them to phosphodiester (O-AS) and phosphorothioate (S-AS) types of oligonucleotides. M-AS inhibited translation in vitro (rabbit reticulocyte lysate) of target mRNA at concentrations as low as 200 nM (e.g. percent inhibition by M-AS 2 at 0.2, 1.0, and 2.0 microM was 40.9 +/- 5.3%, 50.2 +/- 4.6%, and 57.7 +/- 3.6%, respectively, n = 4, p </= 0.002 versus control). Similarly, M-AS 2 effectively, albeit partially, inhibited TNF-alpha production by LPS-stimulated macrophages (RAW 264.7 cells). Incubation of cells with 25 microM M-AS 2 resulted in 32.6 +/- 2.6% (n = 3, p = 0.002 versus control) decrease in TNF-alpha release. In contrast, S-AS inhibited translation of the target mRNA in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate assay, but not in the cell-based assay. In fact, S-AS nonspecifically augmented TNF-alpha release. O-AS were without effect in either system. Uptake studies with fluorescent M-AS revealed that inhibitory effects were seen despite relatively low cellular uptake (intracellular concentration 30.5 +/- 6.7 nM; efficiency of uptake 0.1%). In contrast, flow cytometric and confocal analysis revealed that S-AS were avidly taken up by RAW 264. 7 cells, confirming that their lack of efficacy was not due to lack of uptake. With improved methods of delivery, M-AS may represent an important therapeutic modality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: