The limitations of current and immediate future single-frequency, single-polarization, space-borne SARs for winter sea-ice mapping are quantitatively examined, and improvements are suggested by combining frequencies and polarizations. Ice-type maps are generated using multi-channel, air-borne SAR observations of winter sea ice in the Beaufort Sea to identify six ice conditions: (1) multi-year sea ice; (2) compressed first-year ice; (3) first-year rubble and ridges; (4) first-year rough ice; (5) first-year smooth ice; and (6) first-year thin ice. At a single polarization, C- (λ = 5.6 cm) and L- (λ = 24 cm) band frequencies yield a classification accuracy of 67 and 71%, because C-band confuses multi-year ice and compressed, rough, thick first-year ice surrounding multi-year ice floes, and L-band confuses multi-year ice and deformed first-year ice. Combining C- and L-band improves classification accuracy by 20%. Adding a second polarization at one frequency only improves classification accuracy by 10–14% and separates thin ice and calm open water. Under similar winter-ice conditions, ERS-1 ( C vv ) and Radarsat ( C HH ) would overestimate the multi-year ice fraction by 15% but correctly map the spatial variability of ice thickness; J-ERS-1 ( L HH ) would perform poorly;and J-ERS-1 combined with ERS-1 or Radarsat would yield reliable estimates of the old, thick, first-year and thin-ice fractions, and of the spatial distribution of ridges. With two polarizations, future single-frequency space-borne SARs could improve our current capability to discriminate thinner ice types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rignot et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: