Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Property insurance is increasingly recognized as an enabler of not only post-disaster recovery, but also affordable housing, financial resilience, and the wider climate adaptation agenda for individuals and communities. In many cities and communities, however, climate change and other factors such as inflation and overdevelopment are increasing the risk of loss and damage from extreme weather hazards. In response, insurers are raising the premiums they charge for property insurance, or in some cases, withdrawing from vulnerable geographies completely—just at a time when insurance is becoming more important to cities as a tool in their climate adaptation toolkits. Through a conversation among three insurance experts from academia and industry, this article unpacks drivers of uninsurability and explores potential shifts in how responsibility for property risk is shared across an “ecosystem” of public institutions and private sector companies. It offers a practitioner’s look at the role of property insurance in urban climate adaptation and insight into how property insurance may evolve in an uncertain climate future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenslade et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: