Key result
Metabolic syndrome in hypertension is linked to ~83% higher odds of target organ damage.
Why the study?
The value of evaluating metabolic syndrome in predicting cardiovascular disease had recently been criticized, prompting investigation into its influence on target organ damage in hypertensive patients without diabetes mellitus.
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome increase the risk of target organ damage compared to absence of metabolic syndrome or single metabolic components in hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,940)
Yes
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome increase the risk of target organ damage compared to absence of metabolic syndrome or single metabolic components in hypertensive patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In hypertensive patients without diabetes, metabolic syndrome as a composite diagnosis predicts target organ damage more strongly than obesity or any single metabolic component alone, supporting routine comprehensive metabolic evaluation.
Background: The value of metabolic syndrome (MetS) evaluation in predicting cardiovascular disease is recently criticized.We investigated, in hypertensive patients without diabetes mellitus, the influence of MetS on the target organ damage.Methods: Data from the fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey performed in 2008 were analyzed. Metabolic syndrome is defined by the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program-Third Adult Treatment Panel guideline.The category of hypertension is defined following the seventh report of the Joint National Commitee-7 guideline.Results:The prevalence of target organ damage (TOD), defined as history of myocardial infarction/angina/stroke/chronic renal disease as well as the presence of macroalbuminuria, was increased according to blood pressure; 8.5% in the population of normal blood pressure, 12.5% in those of prehypertensive range, and 20.5% in hypertensive population.Hypertensive population associated with MetS showed greater prevalence of TOD than those without MetS even excluding diabetic population.The presence of MetS in hypertensive population showed 2.2 fold increased risk for TOD.Any single parameter of MetS diagnostic criteria as well as obesity did not show the comparable range of risk prediction as MetS.Conclusions:These results indicate a strong relationship of Mets with TOD in hypertensive population.Evaluating the metabolic components in hypertensive population is necessary in establishing management strategies for overall risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension and Metabolic Syndrome (n=2,940). Metabolic syndrome (NCEP-ATP III criteria with Korean waist circumference cutoffs >=90 cm in men and >=85 cm in women) vs. Absence of metabolic syndrome in hypertensive patients was evaluated on Target organ damage (composite of history of myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, or chronic renal disease, or presence of proteinuria >=1+ on dipstick) (OR 1.827, 95% CI 1.823-1.831, p=<0.001). Metabolic syndrome in hypertensive patients was associated with a significantly higher risk of target organ damage (18.6% vs 14.8%; OR 1.827, 95% CI 1.823-1.831, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: