Why the study?
African swine fever virus causes devastating hemorrhagic disease and uses multiple mechanisms to interfere with type I interferon signaling to evade host immune defenses.
ASFV protein pNP419L acts as a novel antagonist of type I interferon responses by directly binding ISRE and disrupting ISGF3-DNA interactions, revealing a potential target for live-attenuated vaccines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
pNP419L as IFN-I antagonist may guide ASFV studies; leaves open in vivo validation and therapeutic targeting.
African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes devastating hemorrhagic diseases characterized by significant mortality rates, thereby presenting substantial challenges to the global pork industry. ASFV employs multiple mechanisms to interfere with type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling, enabling it to evade host immune defenses. This study identifies pNP419L, one of the smallest DNA ligases encoded by ASFV, as a novel antagonist of IFN-I responses. pNP419L suppresses IFN-α-induced promoter activation of interferon-sensitive response elements (ISRE) and subsequent production of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), promoting viral replication. Mechanistically, pNP419L directly interacts with ISRE via its DNA-binding domain (DBD), a strategy that is evolutionarily linked to its viral DNA ligase activity and effectively disrupts the STAT1/STAT2/IRF9 ternary complex (ISGF3)-DNA interactions. Functional analyses reveal selective targeting of the IRF9 transcriptional activation module, as pNP419L inhibits IRF9/VP16(TA)-mediated ISRE activity but does not affect GAL4/STAT2(TA)- driven transcription. Truncation of the DBD abolishes ISG suppression, suggesting that this modified form could be a potential candidate for live-attenuated vaccine development. These findings elucidate an immune evasion mechanism employed by ASFV, enhance our understanding of viral IFN antagonism, and provide insights into vaccination and therapeutic strategies against African swine fever.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: