Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two geometrical isomers of silyl(methyl)platinum complexes cis - and trans -PtMe(SiPh 3 )L 2 (L = PMe 2 Ph, PMePh 2 ) exhibited entirely different reactivities toward phenylacetylene. Reactions of cis -PtMe(SiPh 3 )L 2 (L = PMe 2 Ph ( 1a ), PMePh 2 ( 1b )) with phenylacetylene readily proceeded at room temperature in benzene to give the acetylene-insertion products cis -PtMe{C(Ph) CH(SiPh 3 )}L 2 (L = PMe 2 Ph ( 3a ), PMePh 2 ( 3b ), respectively). In contrast, trans -PtMe(SiPh 3 )L 2 complexes (L = PMe 2 Ph ( 2a ), PMePh 2 ( 2b )) were totally inactive toward acetylene insertion. The cis -organo(silyl)platinum complexes cis -PtMe(SiPh 3 )(PMe 3 )(PMePh 2 ) ( 1c ) and cis -Pt(COEt)(SiPh 3 )(PMe 2 Ph) 2 ( 6d ) also underwent the insertion of phenylacetylene into the Pt−SiPh 3 bond to provide quantitative yields of cis -PtMe{C(Ph) CH(SiPh 3 )}(PMe 3 )(PMePh 2 ) ( 3c ) and cis -Pt(COEt){C(Ph) CH(SiPh 3 )}(PMe 2 Ph) 2 ( 7 ), respectively. The molecular structures of 3a, c were determined by X-ray diffraction studies. Kinetic studies on the formation of 7 revealed the insertion process initiated by rate-determining displacement of one of the PMe 2 Ph ligands in 6d with phenylacetylene.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozawa et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: