Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims To ascertain whether hip flexor explosive strength, agility, and functional mobility tests can discriminate between multiple-step (MS) and single-step (SS) fall avoidance strategies.Methods Thirty-six community-dwelling older women (79.6 ± 5.9 years) were evaluated using a tether-release method to induce forward balance recovery and were classified into MS (n = 17) and SS (n = 19) groups. Hip flexor isometric maximum strength, peak normalized rate of force development (NRFD), time-to-peak RFD, five-times sit-to-stand (FSST), two-square agility test, ten-step test (TST), 20-s open-close stepping, and walking speed were assessed. Discriminant analysis was performed to identify the factors differentiating the MS and SS groups.Results The MS group showed lower NRFD, slower time-to-peak RFD, and worse performance in the FSST and TST. A model combining NRFD and TST achieved a 91.6% discrimination rate.Conclusion Hip flexor explosive strength and agility, particularly rapid alternate foot placement, may help distinguish fall avoidance strategies in older women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: