Why the study?
Is a subnormal peripheral blood leukocyte count associated with a lower prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome?
Is a subnormal peripheral blood leukocyte count associated with a lower prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome?
Subnormal peripheral blood leukocyte counts are independently associated with the lowest prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome, suggesting a potential protective or predictive value of lower inflammatory status.
May aid risk stratification via leukocyte monitoring; leaves open whether modulating inflammation alters metabolic syndrome incidence.
Few studies have assessed the relationship between a subnormal inflammatory status and metabolic syndrome (MS). We therefore designed a cross-sectional and 5-year cohort study to evaluate how a subnormal peripheral blood leukocyte count is related to MS. Participants were recruited from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital-Health Management Centre. Both a baseline cross-sectional (n = 46,179) and a prospective assessment (n = 13,061) were performed. Participants without a history of MS were followed up for 5 years. Leukocyte counts and MS components were assessed at baseline and yearly during the follow-up. Adjusted logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess relationships between the categories of leukocyte counts and MS. The subnormal leukocyte counts group (1,100-3,900 cells/mm(3)) had the lowest prevalence and incidence of MS. The odds ratio and hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of the highest leukocyte counts were 1.98 (1.57-2.49) and 1.50 (1.22-1.84) (both P for trend <0.0001), respectively, when compared to the subnormal leukocyte counts group after adjusting for potential confounders. This study has shown that subnormal leukocyte counts are independently related to the lowest prevalence and incidence of MS. The findings suggest that it is necessary to restudy and discuss the clinical or preventive value of subnormal leukocyte counts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: