Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Conventional total aortic arch repair is a high-risk procedure, particularly for high-risk patients. Although endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysm is a recently induced procedure, only a few cases are indicated and outcomes are questionable. Here, we report on the early and short-term results of our surgical procedure, i.e. hybrid arch repair with supra-aortic debranching and endografting into the ascending aorta. METHODS: Of the 514 patients who underwent arch repairs from 1997 to March 2012, 40 (28 males; mean age 74.4 years) were high-risk patients for whom hybrid arch repair of the ascending aortic landing zone was performed. Aortic pathologies included 31 degenerative aneurysms (including two ruptures), three type A dissections and four type B dissections. We performed supra-aortic debranching from the ascending aorta and endografting into the ascending aorta in 28 patients (including 10 patients with graft replacements and 3 patients with banding of the ascending aorta). For the 12 patients with an ascending aorta diameter of <36 mm, the chimney graft technique into the innominate artery was performed. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 3%. Postoperative complications were as follows: stroke (0 patient), haemodialysis (1), prolonged mechanical ventilation (2) and spinal cord ischaemia (1). There were one early type I and two type II endoleaks. The mean follow-up duration was 15.5 months, during which freedom from aorta-related death and aortic events were 91 and 89% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved satisfactory early and short-term results with hybrid arch repair into the ascending aorta. Our findings suggest that hybrid repair into the ascending aorta may be a viable option for high-risk patients with aortic arch pathologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirakawa et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: