Why the study?
Does endovascular repair compared to open surgical repair improve outcomes in patients undergoing elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Does endovascular repair compared to open surgical repair improve outcomes in patients undergoing elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial discusses the first randomized comparisons of endovascular versus open techniques for elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
The publication in this issue of the Journal of the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial1 and the recent publication of a similar study from the United Kingdom2 provide the first randomized comparisons of the endovascular and open techniques for elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Elective repair is undertaken to prevent the rupture of aneurysms, which carries a mortality rate of about 80 percent. More than 40,000 procedures are performed each year in the United States. Open surgical repair, in which the aneurysm is opened and a graft sewn into place under direct vision, has proved durable in . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank A. Lederle (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: