Why the study?
Does pravastatin 40 mg improve ventriculo-vascular haemodynamic interactions and endothelial function in young men with type 1 diabetes?
Does pravastatin 40 mg improve ventriculo-vascular haemodynamic interactions and endothelial function in young men with type 1 diabetes?
Short-term pravastatin therapy improves microvascular and conduit vessel function in young men with type 1 diabetes, potentially mitigating early atherogenesis.
Supports early pravastatin in young men with type 1 diabetes; extends statin benefits to endothelial and microvascular function.
Young patients with diabetes but without established vascular disease have altered conduit and resistance artery reactivity. Early endothelial dysfunction is an initial step in atherogenesis: reductions in nitric oxide (NO) production in these vascular beds are implicated. The study aim was two-fold: first, to detect baseline abnormalities in cardiac function, conduit vessels and the microcirculation using applanation tonometry, brachial artery ultrasound and laser Doppler fluximetry, respectively; and second, to investigate any modification in these parameters with the use of pravastatin. Nine young men with diabetes and normoalbuminuria were randomised in a double-blind cross-over fashion to placebo or pravastatin (40 mg) treatment for two weeks. They underwent scans on three separate occasions. Control patients (n=12) underwent a baseline scan but were not given any drug treatment. It was found that patients with diabetes had significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate and Buckberg index (propensity to myocardial ischaemia). Brachial artery reactivity and microcirculatory dilation were both reduced. Levels of von Willebrand Factor, a marker of endothelial damage, were also elevated. Pravastatin treatment restored these sub-clinical abnormalities towards normal levels. In conclusion, pravastatin improves vascular abnormalities in young male patients with diabetes through alterations in microcirculation and conduit vessel function, with secondary myocardial effects. This may be of benefit in preventing end-organ injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casey et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: