Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a tertiary center in India, ACS patients received high rates of evidence-based therapies and had 1-year mortality and MACE rates comparable to developed nations.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of death in India. Data on outcome of CAD is scarce in the Indian population. This study determined the characteristics, treatment and one-year outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in an Indian Cardiac Centre. METHODS: We carried out a cross sectional retrospective analysis of 1468 ACS patients hospitalized between January 2008 and December 2010 and followed up for 1 year in the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai. Mortality at 1 year, its determinants and 1 year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were determined. RESULTS: The patients were aged 62.2 ± 11.2 years; males (75.2%) and had ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (33.9%), non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (44.2%) and unstable angina (21.9%). Key pharmacotherapy included aspirin (98.2%), clopidogrel (95.1%), statins (95.6%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (50.6%) and beta blocker (83.1%). Angiography rate was 80.6%. In the STEMI group, 53.3% had primary angioplasty, 20.3% were thrombolysed and 16.1% received sole medical therapy. Overall coronary artery bypass graft rate was 12.4%. At one year, all-cause mortality and composite MACE were 2.5% and 9.7%, respectively. MACE included death (2.5%), reinfarction (4.0%), resuscitated cardiac arrest (1.8%), stroke (1.1%) and bleeding (0.4%). Main factors associated with mortality were combined left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction (OR = 20.0, 95% CI = 6.63-69.4) and positive troponin I (OR = 12.56, 95% CI = 1.78-25.23). Troponin I independently predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: ACS population was older than previously described in India. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy and interventions, and outcomes were comparable to the developed nations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isezuo et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: