Why the study?
Whether different sulfonylurea affinities to cardiac mitoKATP channels account for intraclass differences in cardiovascular risk had not been assessed in a general population with T2D receiving metformin.
Does the use of mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas compared to low-affinity sulfonylureas increase MACE risk in patients with T2D treated with metformin?
Does the use of mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas compared to low-affinity sulfonylureas increase MACE risk in patients with T2D treated with metformin?
In patients with T2D on metformin, the use of high-affinity sulfonylureas (glyburide, glipizide) is associated with a higher risk of MACE and severe hypoglycemia compared to low-affinity sulfonylureas (gliclazide, glimepiride).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-affinity sulfonylureas were associated with increased MACE versus low-affinity agents in T2D on metformin; leaves open whether mitoKATP affinity drives risk and requires randomized confirmation.
Importance: Sulfonylureas are frequently used as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D), and individual sulfonylurea agents carry different risks of cardiovascular disease. Sulfonylureas' different affinities to cardiac mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (mitoKATP) channels have been speculated to account for the intraclass difference in cardiovascular risk from in vitro and ex vivo studies; however, this hypothesis has not been assessed in a general population with diabetes receiving sulfonylureas added to metformin. Objective: To compare the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients with T2D treated with mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas and low-affinity sulfonylureas as add-on to metformin. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a new-user, active-comparator, and propensity score-matched cohort study with analysis of the Taiwanese Diabetes Mellitus Health Database from 2006, to 2017. Data analysis was performed from August 2020 to July 2021. Exposures: Cardiac mitoKATP channel high-affinity (glyburide and glipizide) and low-affinity (gliclazide and glimepiride) sulfonylureas combined with metformin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for either MI or ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included individual MACE components, heart failure, arrhythmia, all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Results: Each sulfonylurea group comprised 53 714 patients (mean [SD] age, 54.7 [12.1] years; 31 962 men [59.5%]). MitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas vs low-affinity sulfonylureas when combined with metformin were associated with an increased risk of MACE (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34), MI (aHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.73), all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.57), and severe hypoglycemia (aHR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.58-2.10), but not with increased risks of ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, arrhythmia, and heart failure. The duration analyses revealed the highest MACE risk during 1 to 90 days after initiation of mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas (aHR, 6.06; 95% CI, 4.86-7.55). Conclusions and Relevance: Use of mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas vs low-affinity sulfonylureas was associated with an increased MACE risk in patients with T2D concomitantly receiving metformin, suggesting that high-affinity blockage of the mitoKATP channels could account for sulfonylurea-associated MACEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: