Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study analyzed the effect of mite-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) on patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). We enrolled 98 AR patients visiting our hospital from April 2017 to April 2019 and grouped them in a random number table. The control group (n=49) received conventional treatment for three years. The SCIT used a standardized mite allergen injection for the experimental group (n=49) for three years. The study compared total nasal symptom score (TNSS), daily medication score (DMS), total combined score (TCS), visual analog scale (VAS) score, mini-rhinitis quality of life questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) score, and serum immunoglobulin E (sIgE) level before and after treatment. The overall response rate was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (59.18% vs. 30.61%, p<0.05). After treatment, the experimental group had lower values for TCS and VAS score (p<0.05); motion score; practical problems; nasal, ocular, and other symptoms (p<0.05); and sIgE, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp)-sIgE, and Dermatophagoides farinae (Df)-sIgE levels (p<0.05) than the control group. The sIgE, Dp-sIgE, and Df-sIgE levels were lower in the effective group than in the ineffective group (p<0.05). The areas under the ROC curves of IgE, Dp-sIgE, and Df-sIgE and their combination for predicting the therapeutic effect of mite-specific SCIT on AR were 0.839, 0.779, 0.814, and 0.903, respectively. Mite-specific SCIT relieved clinical symptoms and improved the quality of life of AR patients, probably by decreasing the IgE expression level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: