Why the study?
The proportional reduction of symptomatic VTE with pharmacological prophylaxis in temporary lower limb immobilisation after injury remains unclear, leading to wide variation in practice and conflicting guidelines.
Does pharmacological thromboprophylaxis reduce VTE events in patients with temporary lower limb immobilisation after injury?
Does pharmacological thromboprophylaxis reduce VTE events in patients with temporary lower limb immobilisation after injury?
This review summarizes recent evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis for patients with temporary lower limb immobilization after injury.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thromboprophylaxis decisions in temporary lower limb immobilization should not yet change; leaves open need for definitive RCTs.
Venous thromboembolic disease is a major global cause of morbidity and mortality. An estimated 10 million episodes are diagnosed yearly; over half of these episodes are provoked by hospital admission/procedures and result in significant loss of disability adjusted life years. Temporary lower limb immobilisation after injury is a significant contributor to the overall burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Existing evidence suggests that pharmacological prophylaxis could reduce overall VTE event rates in these patients, but the proportional reduction of symptomatic events remains unclear. Recent studies have used different pharmacological agents, dosing regimens and outcome measures. Consequently, there is wide variation in thromboprophylaxis strategies, and international guidelines continue to offer conflicting advice for clinicians. In this review, we provide a summary of recent evidence assessing both the clinical and cost effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in patients with temporary immobilisation after injury. We also examine the evidence supporting stratified thromboprophylaxis and the validity of widely used risk assessment methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horner et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: