Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new concept, “radical-controlled” oxidative polymerization of phenols catalyzed by a tyrosinase model complex, has been proposed. A μ-η 2:η 2 -peroxo dicopper(II) species formed by the reaction between the catalyst complex and dioxygen, reacted with phenol to give “controlled” phenoxy radical−copper(I) intermediate instead of “free” phenoxy radical. The polymerization of 4-phenoxyphenol was performed by the use of the tyrosinase model complexes, (hydrotris(3,5-diphenyl-1-pyrazolyl)borate)copper (Cu(Tpzb)) chloride complex and (1,4,7- R 3 -1,4,7-triazacyclononane)copper (Cu(L R ): R = isopropyl (iPr), cyclohexyl (cHex), n -butyl (nBu)) dichloride complexes. The structures of these complexes were determined by X-ray crystallography, indicating that the order of steric repulsion of the substituents (R) in the Cu(L R ) complexes is cHex > iPr > nBu. Very little of C−C coupling dimers were afforded with the Cu(Tpzb) catalyst in toluene or THF, and with the Cu(L iPr ), Cu(L cHex ), or Cu(L nBu ) catalyst in toluene. The selectivity of para C−O coupling increased with an increase in the steric hindrance of R for the Cu(L R ) catalysts. On the other hand, the formation of C−C dimers was clearly observed in the polymerization catalyzed by a copper/diamine complex or horseradish peroxidase. The selective polymerization almost without the C−C dimer formation produced crystalline poly(1,4-phenylene oxide) having a melting point, although the polymer contained small amounts of 1,2,4-trioxybenzene units (ca. 1−5 unit %). However, the polymers obtained in the cases involving the C−C dimer formation showed no clear melting points. The reaction mechanism of catalytic cycle and oxidative polymerization is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higashimura et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: