Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A systematic comparison between 1,3‐difluorobenzene, 1,3‐dichlorobenzene, and 1,3‐dibromobenzene did not reveal major differences in their behavior towards strong bases such as lithium diisopropylamide or lithium 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidide. Thus, all 2,6‐dihalobenzoic acids 1 are directly accessible by consecutive treatment with a suitable base and dry ice. In contrast, (2,6‐dichlorophenyl)‐ and (2,6‐bromophenyl)triethylsilane ( 2a and 2b ) were found to undergo deprotonation at the 5‐position (affording acids 3 and, after deprotection, 4 ), whereas the 1,3‐difluoro analog is known to react at the 4‐position. The 2,4‐dihalobenzoic acids 7 were selectively prepared from either the silanes 2 (by bromination at the 4‐position, metalation and carboxylation of the neighboring position, followed by desilylation and debromination) or the 1,3‐dihalo‐2‐iodobenzenes 8 (by base‐promoted migration of iodine to the 4‐position followed by iodine/magnesium permutation and subsequent carboxylation). (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heiss et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: