Why the study?
The growing understanding of extracellular vesicles in biological and pathological processes highlighted the need to translate this knowledge into practical diagnostic and prognostic algorithms for clinical medicine.
Extracellular vesicles and their cargo (proteins, miRNAs) hold promising diagnostic and prognostic potential across various diseases, including cancer and ischemic injuries.
EV cargo diagnostics remain exploratory in cardiovascular disease; leaves open standardized validation before clinical adoption.
Highlights The review is dedicated to analysis of available data on diagnostic significance of extracellular vesicles and their nucleic acids and proteins cargo. The analysis is focused on clinical application of testing systems in various pathological conditions and illnesses. In particular, diagnostic value of miRNA levels in different types of cancer are also presented. Abstract The increased number of performed studies investigating biological nature of extracellular vesicles, as well as their participation in many biological and pathological processes, determines the need to translate the acquired knowledge into practical medicine. The development of diagnostic and prognostic algorithms based on the study of the level of target extracellular vesicles in patients with various pathological conditions is the most promising way of translation of this knowledge. This review attempts to systematize the available data on the experience and/or prospects for the use of certain classes of extracellular vesicles in the diagnosis of the most common diseases and pathological conditions (ischemic and reperfusion injuries of tissues and organs, infectious and non-infectious inflammatory diseases, malignant tumors, etc.). Potentially applicable extracellular vesicles for diagnostic purposes are considered separately in terms of their protein composition, as well as in terms of the repertoire of transferred nucleic acids (primarily miRNAs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kudryavtsev et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: