Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sufficient understanding of surface chemistry for electrode and electrolytes during an electrochemical process is a crucial issue to further improve the performance of lithium ion batteries (LIB). In this study, we systematically investigate the interaction between propylene carbonate (PC)-based electrolytes and graphite anode material, which has been under dispute for a long time in the electrochemical community, and a new physical model is proposed to explain the poor compatibility of PC with graphite. With the aid of scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam workstation, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetry−differential scanning calorimetry, the cumbersome but intriguing questions on the poor compatibility are addressed: (i) Does PC truly have the ability to co-intercalate into graphite materials? Our answer is yes. (ii) Where is the intercalation site? It is around the crystal boundary. (iii) Why does the co-intercalation occur for PC not ethylene carbonate another kind of useful electrolyte in LIB, since both of them have a similar molecular structure? The methyl group in the PC molecule is the main wire-puller, which makes decomposition products of PC puffed and thus incompetent in inhibiting the subsequent co-intercalation. Finally, three feasible strategies to overcome the poor compatibility are summarized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: