This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Thirteen normal subjects, sitting in a body plethysmograph and breathing through a pneumotachograph, performed forced vital capacity maneuvers after a rapid inspiration without or with an end-inspiratory pause (maneuvers 1 and 2) and after a slow inspiration without or with an end-inspiratory pause (maneuvers 3 and 4), the pause lasting 4-6 s. Inspirations were initiated close to functional residual capacity. At all lung volumes, expiratory flow was larger with maneuver 1 than with any other maneuver and, over the upper volume range, larger with maneuver 3 than with maneuver 4, whereas it was similar for maneuvers 2 and 4. Relative to corresponding values with maneuver 4, peak expiratory flow was approximately 16 and approximately 4% larger with maneuvers 1 and 3, respectively, whereas forced expiratory volume in 1 s increased by approximately 5% only with maneuver 1. The time dependence of maximal flow-volume curves is consistent with the presence of viscoelastic elements within the respiratory system (D'Angelo et al. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 2602-2610, 1991).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Angelo et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: