This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Two mononuclear ruthenium complexes [(bpy) 2 Ru II L 1 /L 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 ([ 1 ] 2+ / [ 2 ] 2+ ) (bpy-2,2′ bipyridine, L 1 = 2,3-di(pyridin-2-yl)pyrazino[2,3- f ][1,10]phenanthroline) and L 2 = 2,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrazino[2,3- f ][1,10]phenanthroline have been synthesized. The complexes have been characterized using various analytical techniques. The complex [ 1 ] 2+ has further been characterized by its single crystal X-ray structure suggesting ruthenium is coordinating through the N donors of phenanthroline end. Theoretical investigation suggests that the HOMOs of both complexes are composed of pyridine and pyrazine unit of ligands L 1 and L 2 whereas the LUMOs are formed by the contribution of bipyridine units. The low energy bands at ∼480 nm of the complexes can be assigned as MLCT with partial contribution from ligand transitions, whereas the rest are ligand centered. The complexes have shown Ru II /Ru III oxidation couples at E 1/2 at 1.26 (70 mV) V and 1.28 (62 mV) V for [ 1 ] 2+ and [ 2 ] 2+ vs Ag/AgCl, respectively, suggesting no significant role of distal thiophene or pyridine units of the ligands. The complexes are emissive and display solvent dependent emission properties. Both complexes have shown highest emission quantum yield and lifetime in DMSO (ϕ = 0.05 and τ avg = 460 ns and λ max em at 620 nm for [ 1 ] 2+; ϕ = 0.043 and τ avg = 425 ns and λ max em at 635 nm for [ 2 ] 2+ ). Further, the long luminescent lifetime of these complexes has been utilized to generate reactive oxygen species for efficient azo dye decomposition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singha et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: