Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 30, 2023Journal of Global HealthOpen Access

Critical care delivery across health care systems in low-income and low-middle-income country settings: A systematic review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EBEmily S. BartlettALAndrew George LimSKSean M Kivlehan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review reveals that half of critical care in low- and middle-income countries occurs outside intensive care units, highlighting widespread reliance on general wards and nonspecialists.

Key Points

  • To characterize the breadth of critical care interventions, service delivery models, and clinical providers across health care systems in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
  • Conducted a systematic review of English-language studies across multiple databases examining critical care interventions or services in low- and lower-middle-income countries published between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2020 (PROSPERO CRD42019146802).
  • Included 1620 studies evaluating human subjects across diverse demographic groups, clinical care settings, and health provider cadres.
  • Critical care delivery took place in-hospital in 94% of studies and out-of-hospital in 6.2%, with 49% of care provided outside of a designated intensive care unit.
  • Study populations comprised pediatric patients (45%), adults (43%), infants (23%), geriatric patients (8.9%), and maternal patients (4.2%).
  • Specialist physicians delivered care in 60% of included studies, followed by general physicians (40%), specialist physician trainees (22%), pharmacists (16%), advanced nursing or midlevel practitioners (8.9%), ambulance providers (3.3%), and respiratory therapists (3.1%).

Cite This Study

Bartlett et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8288f6576c5bd0156cfe01https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04141
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement2015 · 27,121 citations
  2. 2Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study2020 · 8,209 citations
  3. 3Responsiveness of emergency obstetric care systems in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a critical review of the “third delay”2012 · 44 citations
  4. 4The Effect of Multidisciplinary Care Teams on Intensive Care Unit Mortality2010 · 533 citations
  5. 5Intensive Care Unit Capacity in Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review2015 · 391 citations