Novel water-soluble decacationically armed C(60) and C(70) decaiodide monoadducts, C(60)- and C(70)[>M(C(3)N(6)(+)C(3))(2)], were synthesized, characterized, and applied as photosensitizers and potential nano-PDT agents against pathogenic bacteria and cancer cells. A high number of cationic charges per fullerene cage and H-bonding moieties were designed for rapid binding to the anionic residues displayed on the outer parts of bacterial cell walls. In the presence of a high number of electron-donating iodide anions as parts of quaternary ammonium salts in the arm region, we found that C(70)[>M(C(3)N(6)(+)C(3))(2)] produced more HO(•) than C(60)[>M(C(3)N(6)(+)C(3))(2)], in addition to (1)O(2). This finding offers an explanation of the preferential killing of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by C(60)[>M(C(3)N(6)(+)C(3))(2)] and C(70)[>M(C(3)N(6)(+)C(3))(2)], respectively. The hypothesis is that (1)O(2) can diffuse more easily into porous cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria to reach sensitive sites, while the less permeable Gram-negative bacterial cell wall needs the more reactive HO(•) to cause real damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: