Why the study?
The study investigated the effect of omitting a distal locking screw in intramedullary nailing of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures on clinical outcomes.
Does omitting a distal locking screw in intramedullary nailing improve operative metrics and clinical outcomes in geriatric patients with stable intertrochanteric femur fractures?
Does omitting a distal locking screw in intramedullary nailing improve operative metrics and clinical outcomes in geriatric patients with stable intertrochanteric femur fractures?
Omitting distal locking in proximal femoral nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures significantly reduces operative time, fluoroscopy exposure, and blood loss without affecting fracture union.
May support omitting distal locking in stable intertrochanteric nailing to reduce operative time; extends RCT evidence for simplified fixation in geriatrics.
Background This study aimed to investigate the effect of omitting a distal locking screw in intramedullary nailing of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures on clinical outcomes. Methods Ninety-six patients over 65 years old with stable pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) treated with short/intermediate proximal femoral nails (PFNA-II) were randomly assigned into two groups: Group 1 (distal locked) and Group 2 (distal unlocked). Comparative analyses were conducted on operative time, total fluoroscopy time, blood loss, incision length, complications, and functional outcomes. Results The mean operative time was significantly shorter in Group 2 (35.73 ± 7.62 minutes) compared to Group 1 (47.40 ± 9.96 minutes) ( P < 0.001). Fluoroscopy time was also shorter in Group 2 (45.92 ± 6.08 seconds) compared to Group 1 (54.02 ± 5.94 seconds) ( P < 0.001). Incision length was reduced in Group 2 (9.21 ± 1.41 centimeters) compared to Group 1 (12.96 ± 1.68 centimeters) ( P < 0.001). Blood loss was lower in Group 2 (187.50 ± 32.00 milliliters) than in Group 1 (208.65 ± 49.12 milliliters) ( P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in fracture union time, hospital stay, fracture union weeks, or postoperative blood transfusion rates. Conclusions Proximal femoral nailing without distal locking offers shorter operative times, reduced fluoroscopy exposure, and lower blood loss and complications, making it a viable option for treating stable intertrochanteric fractures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sağlam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: