Why the study?
Does external ultrasound sensor compared to internal scalp electrode affect linear and nonlinear FHR indices in normal labouring women?
Does external ultrasound sensor compared to internal scalp electrode affect linear and nonlinear FHR indices in normal labouring women?
The mode of foetal heart rate acquisition (internal vs external) and the sampling rate significantly affect most FHR indices, which has implications for the interpretation of foetal monitoring data.
External FHR sensors may alter linear/nonlinear indices versus internal electrodes; leaves open standardization needs before clinical or research use.
The effect of foetal heart rate (FHR) acquisition mode on linear and nonlinear parameters is still largely unknown. In 33 normal labouring women, FHR signals were acquired simultaneously by an external ultrasound sensor applied to the maternal abdomen and an internal scalp electrode, in the minutes preceding delivery. For each case, the initial and final 5, 10 and 20 min segments were analysed, considering FHR signals at a frequency of 4 Hz (the frequency at which they are transmitted by the majority of commercialized foetal monitors). Several time and frequency domain linear and nonlinear FHR indices were computed in these segments, namely mean FHR, very low frequency (VLF), low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn). Parametric confidence intervals, statistical tests and correlation coefficients were calculated in order to evaluate the effect of internal versus external FHR monitoring modes on the considered indices. The whole evaluation was repeated using FHR signals at a frequency of 2 Hz. Most time domain linear indices were similar with external and internal monitoring in the initial and final segments of the tracings. However, linear frequency domain indices were poorly correlated in the final segments and had significantly different mean values in the initial segments. Nonlinear indices were significantly different in both initial and final segments. The correlation between 4 and 2 Hz sampled parameters was high for both linear and nonlinear indices (most correlation coefficient values ranging between 0.95 and 1) but nonlinear index values were significantly higher at 2 Hz. In conclusion, the mode used to acquire FHR signals and the sampling rate employed can significantly affect most FHR indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalves et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: