It is shown that the flux increases of trapped ions and electrons observed by Explorer 45 at L ≤4 during two large geomagnetic storms can be quantitatively explained by a 1–3 R E inward radial displacement of the preexisting trapped particle distribution. This proposed source for the storm time ring current at L ≤4 requires only the acceleration of the previously existing trapped particle population via inward displacement under conservation of the first two adiabatic invariants. No source of new trapped particles at L ≤4 is required. It was not possible to test whether such an inward radial displacement can account for storm time flux increases at any radial distances beyond L =4; however, the existence of particle losses implies that new particles are injected into the trapping region beyond L =4. The required inward radial displacements of the trapped particles can be explained by an equatorial electric field with an average azimuthal component of ∼0.3–1.0 mV/m, which is a factor of 2 or 3 greater than electric fields observed within the plasmasphere in association with typical, nonstorm time, substorm activity. It is suggested that a significant difference between large geomagnetic storms and typical substorm activity may be inward convection occurring over a large (≳270°) longitude range during storms but only over a small (≲90°) longitude range during typical substorms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyons et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: