Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine and interleukin (IL)-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma as second-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with histologically confirmed stage IV melanoma previously treated with temozolomide-based chemotherapy--only one regimen of chemotherapy for disseminated disease was allowed--were treated with vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and IL-2 subcutaneous 9 x 10(6) once daily on days 2-6 and 16-19 every 4 weeks for maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: From January 2000 to July 2001, 22 patients entered the study; the median age was 56 years. Among 20 evaluable patients there were 2 (9.1%) objective responses including 1 complete response and 1 partial response. Five (22.7%) had stabilization of their disease, and 13 (59.1%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 2.9 months and the median overall survival was 9.1 months. There was a significant difference in TTP in patients who responded or remained stable (median TTP 10.75 months) and those who progressed (median TTP 2.1 months) (p<0.05). There was also a difference in survival in the two groups (p<0.05 (28 vs. 8 months). The most common side effects were flulike symptoms, such as fever, chills, fatigue, and injection site reaction. Grade 3 hematological toxicity rarely occurred. One patient discontinued therapy because of fatigue and anorexia. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vinorelbine and IL-2 provides clinical benefit in patients recurring or progressing on first-line chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma, with manageable toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gogas et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: