Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smile aesthetics arise from the harmonious interaction of dental, facial and biological parameters, rather than isolated factors. Contemporary implant rehabilitation therefore requires a facially driven, crown-down approach integrating aesthetics, biology, surgery and prosthodontics. The concept of the ideal future free gingival margin (IFFGM) translates aesthetic analysis into a practical planning guide, defining a clear aesthetic-biological target before implant placement. By relating the IFFGM to existing tissues, clinicians can select preservative, resective or regenerative strategies. This integrated framework enhances predictability, peri-implant health and long-term aesthetic stability, particularly within the aesthetic zone. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Defining the ideal future free gingival margin through facially driven, crown-down planning provides a practical aesthetic–biological reference that guides implant placement and tissue management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mintrone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: