Why the study?
Does the rate of positive bacterial swab cultures differ between de novo pacemaker implantation and pacemaker replacement?
Does the rate of positive bacterial swab cultures differ between de novo pacemaker implantation and pacemaker replacement?
Positive bacterial cultures during pacemaker implantation are common and likely represent intraoperative contamination rather than true colonization, as rates do not differ between new implants and replacements.
Common positive swab cultures during pacemaker implantation likely reflect contamination; leaves open whether routine culturing guides infection prevention.
BACKGROUND: Bacterial cultures of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices removed from patients without clinical infection are often positive, and the cultured bacteria are different from those at the time of clinical infection. This discrepancy has not been adequately explained. We hypothesized that the cause is bacterial contamination at operation and compared the results of bacterial cultures between patients with de novo pacemaker implantation and those with pacemaker replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive 100 patients who underwent cardiac pacemaker implantation (49 de novo implantations, 51 replacements). We took swab cultures from inside the generator pocket (1) immediately after the creation of new pocket or removal of old generator, (2) after connection of leads to new generator, and (3) after pocket lavage. Swab cultures were positive in 272 (45%) of 600 samples. The majority of the cultured bacteria were Propionibacterium species. No statistical difference was detected between de novo implantations and replacements in the positive ratio of swab cultures. The positive ratio was not correlated with the number of previous device replacements. CONCLUSIONS: The positive ratio of swab cultures was not different between new implantations and replacements, suggesting that a positive culture merely indicates contamination of bacteria during operation rather than colonization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okada et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: