Key result
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is linked to ~2.7-fold higher odds of above-average physical quality of life.
Why the study?
Few studies had examined the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life in populations at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease.
Is higher cardiorespiratory fitness associated with better health-related quality of life in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,302)
No
Is higher cardiorespiratory fitness associated with better health-related quality of life in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease?
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is positively associated with physical dimensions of health-related quality of life, particularly in women at risk for cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports fitness-QoL links in at-risk women; leaves open whether interventions improve physical quality of life.
To date, few studies have examined the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in populations at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Purpose To examine the association between objectively measured CRF and physical and mental components of HRQoL in a Uruguayan cohort at risk for developing CVD. Methods Patient data records from 2002–2012 at the Calidad de Vida Center were examined. To assess CRF, participants performed a submaximal exercise test. During the evaluation, participants also completed the SF-36, a HRQoL measure comprised of eight dimensions that are summarized by physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS, respectively). ANCOVA was used to examine the relationship between HRQoL dimensions and CRF. Logistic regression was then used to compare the odds of having a HRQoL component score above the norm across CRF. All analyses were performed separately for males and females with additional stratified analyses across age and BMI conducted among significant trends. Results A total of 2,302 subjects were included in the analysis. Among females, a significant relationship was observed between CRF and vitality, physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, and general health dimensions. However, for males the only dimension found to be significantly associated with CRF was physical health. After adjusting for potential confounders, a significant linear trend (p<0.001) for PCS scores above the norm across CRF levels was observed for females only. Conclusion Among females with one or more risk factors for developing CVD, higher levels of CRF were positively associated with the vitality and physical dimensions of HRQoL, as well as the overall PCS. However, among males the only dimension associated with CRF was physical functioning. Future studies should examine this relationship among populations at risk for developing CVD in more detail and over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clennin et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=2,302). Higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF Quartile 4) vs. Lowest cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF Quartile 1) was evaluated on Health-related quality of life Physical Component Score (PCS) ≥50 (above the norm) in females (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.77-4.05, p=<0.001). Higher cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with greater odds of a physical component quality of life score above the norm in females at risk for CVD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: