Why the study?
Do older patients with coronary heart disease achieve similar improvements in secondary prevention goals and functional measures following cardiac rehabilitation compared to younger patients?
Do older patients with coronary heart disease achieve similar improvements in secondary prevention goals and functional measures following cardiac rehabilitation compared to younger patients?
Cardiac rehabilitation yields significant improvements in secondary prevention measures and functional capacity across all age groups, supporting its utilization in older and very old patients with coronary heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports CR referral for older CHD patients; hypothesis-generating for age-independent secondary prevention gains in real-world cohorts.
In Brief PURPOSE Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) remains underutilized especially among older patients. The present study compares baseline characteristics and CR outcomes between younger and older patients participating in CR. METHODS Comparisons were made between “younger” (<65 years) and “older” patients (≥65 years) for baseline characteristics, changes in selected measures during CR, and the proportion of patients at secondary prevention treatment goals before and after CR. Subanalyses were conducted between “young-old” (65–74 years) and “old-old” (≥75 years) patients. RESULTS At baseline, older patients had lower body mass indexes, better lipid profiles, lower hemoglobin A1c levels (when diabetes was present), and lower Beck Depression Inventory scores (all P < .05) but had higher blood pressures, more comorbidities, and poorer functional capacity as demonstrated by shorter 6-minute walk distance (all P < .05). At CR completion, improvement (P < .05) was achieved among younger patients for all measures except for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and among older patients for all measures except for diastolic blood pressure and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Similar improvements from baseline to CR completion were evident among the “old-old.” While the degree of improvement in individual outcomes varied by age, age group was not a significant predictor of achieving secondary prevention goals at CR completion. CONCLUSIONS Older patients with CHD entered CR with less adverse risk factors but had a higher comorbidity burden than did younger patients. Both groups exhibited significant improvements by CR completion, and these improvements extended to the oldest patients. Research targeting older patients is necessary to guide interventions that promote achievement of secondary prevention goals. This retrospective analysis examined baseline characteristics and outcomes at completion of cardiac rehabilitation among younger and older patients. Results showed significant improvements in both of these populations, with benefits extending into the oldest populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maniar et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: