Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
At eight temperatures T between 0 and 60 °C and at five mole fractions x e of ethanol (0 < x e ≤ 1) the complex (electric) permittivity of ethanol/water mixtures has been measured as a function of frequency ν between 1 MHz and 24 GHz. At 25 °C the ethanol permittivities are completed by literature data for the frequency range 200 MHz to 90 GHz. The spectra for ethanol and for the ethanol/water mixtures are compared to permittivity spectra for water which, at some temperatures, are available up to 900 GHz. All spectra of the ethanol/water system can be well represented by the assumption of two relaxation regions. The relaxation time τ 1 of the dominating relaxation process varies between 4 ps ( x e = 0, 60 °C) and 310 ps ( x e = 1, 0 °C). The relaxation time τ 2 of the second relaxation process is smaller. Evaluation of the extrapolated low frequency (“static”) permittivity yields a minium in the effective dipole orientation correlation of the ethanol/water system at 0.2 ≤ x e ≤ 0.4. In this composition range, other parameters also exhibit extrema, indicating a microheterogeneous structure of the mixtures and the existence of precritical concentration fluctuations. Interesting, the activation enthalpy Δ H 1 ⧧ and entropy Δ S 1 ⧧ of the dominating dielectric relaxation process also display a distinct maximum at around x e = 0.22. These activation quantities have been obtained from Eyring plots of the relaxation time τ 1 at different mixture compositions. The relaxation parameters of the ethanol/water system are discussed in terms of a wait-and-switch model of dipole reorientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petong et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: