Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The enzymatic activation of a promutagenic pyrolysate, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx), was studied using the Ames mutagenesis test system. The enzyme catalyzing the mutagenic activation of MeIQx is mainly localized in the microsomal fraction. A large number of revertants was observed in the presence of hepatic microsomes obtained from 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC)- or polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-treated rats but only a minimal number with the hepatic microsomes from untreated or phenobarbital (PB)-treated rats. In addition, the microsomal activation was reduced efficiently by known inhibitors of cytochrome P-450-mediated reactions such as 7,8-benzoflavone, ellipticine and flavone. Among five forms of purified rat cytochrome P-450, the highest sp. act. (no. of revertants induced/nmol cytochrome P-450) for the activation of MeIQx was observed with a high-spin form of cytochrome P-450, P-448-H, followed by the low-spin form, P-448-L, and to a lesser extent by PB-inducible forms, P-450b and P-450e. P-450-male, which is a main constitutive form of cytochrome P-450 in male rat livers, showed considerable catalysis for the mutagenic activation of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and MeIQx. These results indicate that the metabolic activation of MeIQx is catalyzed mainly by two forms of cytochrome P-450, P-448-H and P-488-L, in the livers of PCB- or 3-MC-treated rats, but also that P-450-male may play an important role in the activation in livers of intact male rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamazoe et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: