Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Study Design. Clinical case series. Objective. To describe a series of patients with progressive sagittal decompensation caused by failure at the caudal end of an instrumented lumbar fusion. Summary of Background Data. Lumbar kyphosis in association with global sagittal decompensation can be a disabling problem, particularly as a late complication of distraction instrumentation. Although kyphosis at the rostral end of instrumented fusions secondary to adjacent segment degeneration has been well described, substantially less has been documented about failure and kyphosis at the caudal end. Methods. Patients who have a progressive lumbar kyphosis and sagittal decompensation requiring operative revision were retrospectively reviewed, and radiographic measurements of lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance were performed to study this problem. Results. There were 13 patients identified. The most common mode of caudal junctional decompensation was related to failure of the most distal fixation. Sagittal decompensation occurred even in the presence of satisfactory lumbar lordosis. Revision surgery and improved sagittal balance were achieved typically using the technique of pedicle subtraction osteotomy and extension of the instrumentation to the sacrum. Osteoporosis, hip osteoarthritis, and substance abuse were commonly observed associations. Conclusions. Fixation failure at the caudal end of lumbar-instrumented fusion should be considered in patients with progressive sagittal decompensation. The high potential for failure of L5 pedicle screws after the index surgery warrants serious consideration of extending such fusions into the sacrum/ilium. This study reviews 13 patients who had progressive kyphotic decompensation caused by failure at the caudal end of an instrumented lumbar fusion. Most patients had failure of the L5 pedicle screws, and global sagittal imbalance often occurred despite the achievement of satisfactory lumbar lordosis. Revision was achieved with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: