Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three screening methods were compared as to specificity and sensitiveness in the detection of cardiac abnormalities by applying them to each of 5,654 children. The three methods consisted of a single-lead (V₃R) electrocardiogram, a miniature chest roentgenogram, and a limited physical examination. For each method it was possible to define a sensitivity index, a specificity index, and their product, an efficiency index. The V₃R gave a specificity index of 0.190 (ratio of true positive to total positive findings), and of 58 children with abnormal V₃R tracings 44 had normal hearts. The physical examination, used singly, was the most specific and the most sensitive and gave the highest efficiency index, but none of the methods was infallible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William E. Morton (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: