Why the study?
Unfamiliarity with management issues and the lack of a comprehensive workflow have limited the adoption of spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar surgery despite its benefits.
Does spinal anesthesia provide a safe and efficacious alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery?
Does spinal anesthesia provide a safe and efficacious alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery?
This review provides a cohesive outline to streamline the implementation of spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar surgery, aiming to improve its availability and accessibility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid standardization of spinal anesthesia in lumbar surgery; leaves open need for RCTs versus general anesthesia.
Spinal anesthesia (SA) is gaining recognition as a safe and efficacious regional alternative to general anesthesia for elective lumbar surgery. However, unfamiliarity with management issues related to its use has limited the adoption of awake spine surgery, despite its benefits. Few centers in the United States routinely offer SA for elective lumbar surgery, and a comprehensive workflow to standardize SA for lumbar surgery is lacking. In this article, we examine recent literature on the use of SA in lumbar surgery, review the experience of our institution with SA in lumbar surgery, and provide a cohesive outline to streamline the implementation of SA from the perspective of the anesthesiologist. We review the critical features of SA in contemporary lumbar surgery, including selection of patients, methods of SA, intraoperative sedation, and management of several important technical considerations. We aimed to flatten the learning curve to improve the availability and accessibility of the technique for eligible patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernandez et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: