Why the study?
Does 1000ml colloid coloading reduce spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in ASA I patients undergoing elective LSCS compared to 1000ml crystalloid coloading?
Does 1000ml colloid coloading reduce spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in ASA I patients undergoing elective LSCS compared to 1000ml crystalloid coloading?
Colloid coloading does not significantly reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension compared to crystalloid coloading in patients undergoing elective LSCS.
Colloid coloading offers no significant advantage over crystalloid for preventing spinal hypotension in elective cesarean delivery; confirms equivalence and questions routine colloid preference.
Background: Spinal anesthesia for LSCS has a high incidence of maternal hypotension which can be severe and disastrous for the fetus and the mother. Coloading in these patients is a physiologically more appropriate method for preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension.Methods: 100 ASA I patients for elective LSCS were randomly divided into two equal groups to either receive 1000ml colloid (6% Hetastarch) or 1000ml crystalloids (Ringer lactate) as coload. NIBP, heart rate SPO2 and incidence of nausea and vomiting and use of ephedrine to treat any hypotension was recorded. Fetal outcome was measured using APGAR score at 0, 1 and 5 minutes.Results: The incidence of hypotension was lesser with colloid coload group (41.7%) as compared to the crystalloid coload group (58.3%) but the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was noted in the incidence of nausea and vomiting and Fetal APGAR score between the two groups.Conclusions: Both Colloid and Crystalloid coloading is effective in decreasing the incidence of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension during LSCS with lesser incidence of hypotension and nausea vomiting with colloid coloading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wani et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: