Why the study?
Does preoperative administration of 6% hetastarch plus lactated Ringer's solution reduce the incidence and severity of hypotension in women undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean section?
Does preoperative administration of 6% hetastarch plus lactated Ringer's solution reduce the incidence and severity of hypotension in women undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean section?
Preoperative administration of 6% hetastarch plus lactated Ringer's solution significantly reduces the incidence and severity of hypotension compared to lactated Ringer's alone in women undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports hetastarch co-loading to reduce spinal hypotension in cesarean delivery; extends evidence favoring colloids over crystalloids alone.
This study was designed to determine whether preoperative administration of 6% hetastarch decreases the incidence and severity of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Forty nonlaboring ASA class I and II women having nonurgent cesarean sections were randomized to receive either 500 mL of 6% hetastarch plus 1 L lactated Ringer's solution (LR) (n = 20), or 2 L of LR (n = 20) prior to induction of spinal anesthesia. Hypotension occurred in 45% of patients who received hetastarch vs 85% of those who received only LR (P < 0.05), and minimum systolic blood pressure was lower in the LR group than in the hetastarch group (85 +/- 12 vs 93 +/- 12 mm Hg [mean +/- SD]; P < 0.05). In addition, the LR group had a higher maximum heart rate (115 +/- 17 vs 104 +/- 16 bpm), a shorter mean time to hypotension (7 +/- 4 vs 10 +/- 7 min), and required more 5-mg doses of ephedrine for treatment of hypotension (0 vs 2 [median]; P < 0.05) than the hetastarch group. Neonatal outcome, as determined by Apgar scores and cord blood gas analyses, was good and similar in both groups. We conclude that 6% hetastarch plus LR is more effective than LR alone and that its routine use before spinal anesthesia for cesarean section should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riley et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: